Monday, August 27, 2007

A Gospel Rant

I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting the one who called you by the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel -- which is really no gospel at all. Evidently some people are throwing you into confusion and are trying to pervert the gospel of Christ. But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let him be eternally condemned! As we have already said, so now I say again: If anybody is preaching to you a gospel other than what you accepted, let him be eternally condemned!
-- Galatians 1:6-9

I read "astonished" there and think you could substitute "pissed off."

I really am in a good mood; I promise I am. But something got into me last night at Element as I, preaching from Exodus 5-6, was talking about the groanings of a "broken spirit and harsh slavery," about dark nights of the soul (yes, we used the new Mother Theresa "revelations" as an illustration), and I began to be overcome with how glorious the cross of Christ is and how satisfactorily it speaks to the cries of the human heart and yet the places where one might find the sufficiency of grace and the satisfaction of Jesus Christ in the American Church are few and far between. It sucks. It really sucks. And it made me really, really angry last night. I had to pause for a second to compose myself, lest I go off on a rant detracting from the point of the message.

So I'm saving that rant for you, dear readers. :-)
Please forgive me if it's disjointed. I really do get emotional about this stuff.

It started, actually, a day or two ago when I saw these heinous videos.

This is total b.s. Complete and utter b.s.
This pitting of "real" against "lame" ones is spiritually bankrupt dreck from the pit of hell. The guy on the right calls himself "authentic," and the people who made these clearly have no clue what "authentic" means. For them, as for most pomo em-church poseurs, it means "cool." Do you see what they're doing here? They are saying the "authentic" Christian is the cool one. That's why the dude on the left has on a nerdy suit and has limp hair.

They could have made a statement about grace vs. works, and under the idiocy, I suppose it might be there, but what they are really doing is mocking fellow believers. We are the cool ones, we are the ones who have it figured out. Plus we have product in our hair.
This has got to stop. This cult of the cool in the church must stop. This fetishizing of hipness must stop. It is idolatry.

And the reality of it is, when you walk into one of these so-called "authentic" churches, you just get the same ol' works religion. Look at the sermon titles and message points. It's all about principles and steps and tips to what-not and hoo-ha. It's just the same behavioristic gospel . . . only cooler.
That's not authentic. That's works religion.

The interesting thing about the above linked videos is that they aren't even original. That's something else that irks me to no end -- the claiming of authenticity all the while ripping off everybody else. These are obviously parodies of the Mac/PC ads, which is admittedly a clever concept. But these folks did the same thing months ago. (So much for innovation.)
And they propagated the same tragic "us vs. them"-ism, pitting a cool Christian (called Christ-follower) against the uncool one (merely called a Christian).
Look, if you're gonna claim authenticity, at least be original.

I just hate this stuff. I hate it. It reduces the glory of the Gospel to a marketing campaign based on who's cooler than whom. That works well when you're selling computers (or soft drinks or what-have-you). But it is flat-out anti-Christian when you're ridiculing other members of the Body to sell your spiritual product.

This is reverse pharisaism. It really is. "I thank you God that I'm not like that lame, religious retard over there."
This is just symptomatic of the consumerist, self-centered, behavioristic, culture-driven lunacy passing for ministry today. It is an anti-gospel, and it is the spirit of the anti-christ at work.

As I was reading over some of Mother Theresa's laments this week, confessions of feeling unwanted by God and hated by God and thrown away by God (when she believed God even existed), groans and cries from the despair deep in her heart, I recalled that anti-christ Benny Hinn once telling a story about being home sick and watching himself on TV and deciding to put his hand on his own hand on the television screen and healing himself. What a lying bastard.
Do you think he would ever admit to feeling that way? One of the guys I watched on TV this week couldn't even admit to ever being sick. They'd no sooner admit they've ever doubted or felt distant from God or unloved by Him.

You will not hear about dark nights of the soul from the likes of Benny Hinn and Joel Osteen and Paula White (who, with her husband, is treating their divorce this week like a hiccup that doesn't matter much to their "ministry" aims -- which means keeping the gravy train running). You will not hear about the real world and the real gospel in response to it from these charlatans because they are afraid you might actually become satisfied in Christ and tire of their lies. They need you discontent so that you will still need them to pick you up.

And if you think this crap is limited to the name-it-claim-it crowd, you are mistaken. It has been creeping into our evangelical churches for years, and you see this discontentment with the Gospel every time you hear a message that treats the Bible like an advice column or a self-help quote book or that treats worship like a performance. Any time the purpose of worship is YOU, you might as well be getting the holy spirit pixie dust from Rod Parsley. It's the same false gospel, just packaged for a different crowd.

The really ridiculous thing is, they don't even take the biblical values and preach those behaviors. I for one don't think the Sermon on the Mount is about behavior and works, but you'd think that if one is going to preach on "what to do" or "how to be," you'd think you might occasionally hear a message about meekness or humility. When was the last time any of these guys preached on "blessed are the poor"? I mean, if you're going to treat Scripture like a self-help resource, you'd think they'd at least come away with some Scriptural values to distort. Instead we get health, wealth, prosperity, "success" -- things the Bible almost cares NOTHING about. At least, not in the ways these liars care about them.

This stuff burns me up.
This is life or death stuff. We are dealing with nothing less than the full glory of God revealed in the complete atoning work of Jesus Christ. We are meant to be living and dying the brutal sacrifice and the triumphant resurrection of Jesus. That this gets reduced to "how to win at work" is evil.

I don't know what Bible these people are reading. Because when I drink deeply from the well of Scripture, when I even barely taste the riches of Christ's work on my behalf, the amazing truth that by grace alone Christ has reconciled me to the God of the Universe, that in the gift of the Holy Spirit I can live a life near and dear to the Father's heart, with the quality of the cross and the power of the resurrection, and then I hear some dude doing this cool/uncool thing or this "how to succeed" thing, I get very, very angry. Like Moses coming down from visiting the LORD on the mountain to discover the Israelites bowing down to a statue wanted to take a sword and destroy the lot of them, I want to curse this idolatry to hell.

And yet, of course, I confess I am no stranger to idolatry myself.

Dear God, make us crave the gospel, make us desire grace, make us satisfied in and with You alone for Your glory alone. Make us satisfied -- joyously, exuberantly, righteously satisfied -- in Your Son for Your glory.

As for those agitators, I wish they would go the whole way and emasculate themselves!
-- Galatians 5:12

38 comments:

Anonymous said...

God bless you.

I invite you - really, out of love - to explore the traditional ancient, deeply rooted traditions of Catholicism and Orthodoxy. You might try reading Pope Benedict's book on The Apostles, just released a few weeks ago. It might turn the way you think about church upside down - and release it from the prison of personality and individual interpretation, which leads to this exhausting treadmill of remaking "Church" - constantly.

God bless!

Daniel said...

Good stuff.

"That this gets reduced to "how to win at work" is evil. "

yes.

I, however, don't think you have to convert to Catholicism or anything. :-)

Jared said...

Daniel, thanks. Me either. :-)
---

Anonymous, thank you for your kind suggestion. I cannot trade orthodox Protestantism for anything else.
I crave grace alone through faith alone; I cannot trade one sort of works salvation for another.
Thanks.

Jon said...

rant on, brother Jared...

Rick Shott said...

What a rant, I feel the same. I watched two of those videos and stopped. It was painful. It was a definite bulls-eye in the recasting of the Pharisee's prayer.

Our biggest problem in this is again the cult of success. Megachurches use their large numbers of attendants to justify their monochromic existence. These videos are just an attempt to create a large following of the hip. Tragically, they become no different from what they distance themselves and never realize it.

Brian said...

Jared,

I read this blog from time to time cuz it makes me think. Sometimes I agree. Sometimes I disagree.

But this one bugged me enough to say something. Some of this post I agree with. Some I disagree. But what seems most bothersome to me was the double standard.

It seems random to me to rant about division in the body of christ and name calling in the church and then to do so in the very same post against those who you evidently don't agree are Christians based on their behavior. This seems to be the very same thing these videos are doing you're so upset about. It's an us verses them thing...

Jared said...

Brian, I expected someone would say that. Wasn't unanticipated.

The difference, I would propose, is that one standard is based on who is cooler, and the other is based on who is preaching the Gospel.
Certainly Paul felt no compunction about calling out false teachers and proponents of works religion. I make no claims to be worthy of even washing Paul's socks, but I would suggest there's not a double standard because while the Church should make room for both cool and uncool, it should not make room for a false gospel.

I also admit this was a venting of anger. I may regret it later.
But not yet.

danm11@mac.com said...

Jared,

Found your post through Bill Kinnon's. Thanks for being willing to be polemic when needed. In every age, to be gospel-centered means that you have distortions all around you. Jesus - and Peter, and Paul - was irenic when dealing with friends, but firm when dealing with the wolves who threatened the sheep of God. These videos are utterly, deeply corrupted by the values of our culture. I only pray that I can stay free enough of those evalues to glorify Christ on Sunday mornings.

Thanks for the word.

Dan MacDonald

Bryan L said...
This post has been removed by the author.
Bird said...

What struck me most (with regard to that video) was, as you pointed out, the lack of authenticity. Can't Christians come out with fresh, new ideas. Why do we always have to play copy cat to the rest of the world?

Good post, brother.

Milly said...

My husband was raised Catholic so I shall be passing on the change to that. I sat next to his a family, asked a lot of questions from the priests, and my husband converted to CoC.

I’m in the Tulsa area and surrounded by some of those folks. Thanks for the revenue to our cities you followers.

The only thing that I can say about the video is this:
I joined a group for women. I won’t give the international group name out because it is a wonderful ministry when done correctly. I joined the team thinking that I would be getting to know women better and helping to reach women who need to know Jesus. When I said that I felt we needed to focus on things like making sure every woman had a bible instead of making the room look pretty I was shut down. It was a constant struggle for me to deal with these ladies as they would stroll in and ignore the women who needed to know God. When things fell apart the leader blamed it on Satan, she said it was his fault that our numbers had dropped and as leaders didn’t trust each other. Ummm no it was our fault that we didn’t trust each other because of the gossip coming from their mouths. I left one meeting in tears after they trashed a family from our church. I realized that I could no longer be with some of them. I stepped down and yes I told them why.


That’s the problem with the video it has a bit of truth sandwiched in. Too sad that some will view it and see truth because they have heard it from Christians.

joel hunter said...

There are things worth coming unglued about and I'm with you Jared--this is one of them.

Your paragraph that begins "And if you think this crap is limited..." is prophetic. I don't think the broader evangelical church gets that it often lives and practices along the same continuum as name-it-claim-it. Blog on.

fr'nklin said...

As one who has been totally guilty of being "authentic" and who gave in to preaching moralistic sermons...God bless you. This is exactly right on target. God has brought me (broken me) to a place of repentance and freed me to revel in the GOSPEL!!!! We need God-focused, Christ-centered, Gospel-driven churches, worship and preaching!

I know I need the Gospel in my life every day to set me free from much more than the culture of cool - to set me free from my self-righteous, self-justifying heart.

Thank you.

Nance said...

I'm still considering your post, Jared.
I absolutely see your point, and I'm not really disagreeing with you... but I just don't see the love in this truth-speaking. You seem, as was mentioned early, almost purposefully divisive. There seems less of a hope for the redemption of a broken form of Christianity and more of a bitter hatred(lying bastard? I just don't see the love in that).
And I am very familiar with Christ's cleansing of the Temple ;) I also think that there's more to that than simply anger, and of course I'm a little slower to question Christ's heart on matters than, well, anyone else's.
But the attitude that I see acknowledging the problem will do little to help anything when it comes to the unity of the Body.

Jared said...

Nance, I hear you.

From the beginning of this site, I did express hope that readers see my love and passion for the Bride of Christ through the occasional soapboxing criticism. I would hope this can be done not by examining an individual post as if hermetically sealed from all the others, but by examining a post in the context of the entire site.

Those who hear me speak, who watch me live . . . I trust they don't see a complaining, unloving curmudgeon, but someone who is in love with grace and therefore "in hate" with false gospels.

I won't defend my language. Probably shouldn't even try.
I will reiterate that I don't believe the anger that provoked it is unrighteous.

This is either life or death stuff or it isn't. This is either about Christ's glory or it isn't. And that stuff is not "cliche" to me, as one response blogger said about this post. It is the heavy weight of things I've lived and experienced.

I can't be ambivalent or merely affectionate of the gospel. I am in love with it, and unfortunately, like Peter, I am very quick to cut off the ears of those opposed to it.

I confess to struggling with self control.

Blessings to you.

Rev. David Lewicki said...

Jared,
No one really liked the original ad campaign either: http://www.slate.com/id/2143810/
All the Apple users I know like the John Hodgman character much better. Call it common grace.

But I'm with the "keep it positive" folks. Let this video campaign bear fruit, or as is more likely, not. Don't give it any more attention than it deserves. Breathe.

Jaredtalladay said...

Thanks, You remind me of Luther for a moment. I'm sure he was pissed off with that hammer in his hand...

Greg said...

Thanks for this post. Somebody needs to be telling it like it is concerning this stuff and you've done an excellent job in doing so.

stephanie said...

Holy anger. It's encouraging.

SDJones said...

Jared,
I came over from the iMonk site. like your rant. I hear the calls from others with regard to a double standard, but I think you are right on the money here. I am fortunate to go to a Lutheran seminary and I have made it a point to take classes from the "traditional" teachers. As a result, Grace, grace, a thousand times grace is what we hear from every part of the Bible. After a while, if I write a sermon that smacks of behavioral motivations and "positive thinking" preaching I feel like I have tried to subvert the Gospel for my own gain. There is something incredibly humbling about seeking Christ crucified and resurrected in the Word and in our lives. On the other side, the vastness of our pride is overwhelming. As in Calvin's understanding, there is no end to it and it is a bottomless pit that must solely rely on God and Christ. I am preaching on the sufficiency of Christ in a few weeks, so this is helpful.
Peace!
SD Jones

Nance said...

thanks for the honest response Jared. this is actually the first post of yours I've read(thank iMonk there, so I'll be careful not to read through a lense from now on.
thanks for the post though--I'm probably actually gonna use these videos for a small group now, to try and look at the very thing that you've nailed here.

Anna said...

"Product in our hair.."

I snorted water with that one. My husband said this past Sunday, as we were walking up to the church doors, that he lacked spiked hair to look truly hip. He had the glasses, the urban shirt, corduroy pants and coordinating shoes, just not the hair. He was being completely humorous. :)

Keep standing on the Gospel!

~Anna

Jared said...

I will!

And I'm gonna keep putting product in my hair too. This mane is just too dang unmanageable without it. :-)

Brendt said...

Doesn't Driscoll have a copyright on "product in His hair"? ;-)

Seriously though, great post!!

Jared said...

LOL, not sure.

He ought to trademark "gay hippie in a dress," "put your pants on," and that "uhhh" thing he does after joke he makes. :-)

Chestertonian Rambler said...

Jared:

I see one of your critiques, and absolutely agree with it. Oh boy do I get it. "We are meant to be living and dying the brutal sacrifice and the triumphant resurrection of Jesus. That this gets reduced to 'how to win at work' is evil." Amen, amen, amen. From one who knows his sin, his laziness, his faithlessness, and his confusion, words that draw me away from myself to God are balm, and doctrines that focus on self-improvement damnable.

At the same time...I wonder if the sort of pre-packaged casual hipness reminded you of something that is endemic to evangelism, but that I've been fortunate enough not to experience. Because what I don't get, really, is your objection to the videos. I didn't enjoy them, per se, but mainly because the humor wasn't really any good. One guy is nerve-wrackingly obsessing over superficial details; the other is...well, quiet. There's a lot of verses in scriptures commanding us to be quiet, to grow peacefully in God. (There are also verses calling for radical repentance and radical change--for everything there is a season). My experience with "hip" churches, I suppose, colors my perception--the last one I attended actually was authentic, preaching the gospel without ever ignoring the difficulties and struggles of the Cross, the constant presence of sin. So I guess I look at the hip guy and think, "well, he could be authentic, or he could merely be shallow." And obviously the other is a gargoyle combining dweebiness, bad theology, and an inability to look at life without obsessively applying scattershots of mixed theology.



SDJones:

"I am fortunate to go to a Lutheran seminary and I have made it a point to take classes from the "traditional" teachers. As a result, Grace, grace, a thousand times grace is what we hear from every part of the Bible."

You are fortunate indeed. I think if Christ was all I heard from every part of the Bible, I'd have a lot more confidence defending Scriptures to nonbelievers.

daveofspades said...

Bravo! Bravo!!

I came across the Christian/Christ- Follower videos a while back. They inspired a similar response in me. A friend of mine summed it up this way: Just what the Church needs, more division.

It's nice to know that there are others out there who see the same things I do.


DD

Brendt said...

Chestertonian Reader said:

...the last ['hip' church] I attended actually was authentic, preaching the gospel without ever ignoring the difficulties and struggles of the Cross, the constant presence of sin.

Bravo to that church. Unfortunately, that is not the message of these videos. If it was, "religious" man wouldn't even be present -- or at least wouldn't have so much of the screen time. This video (and the Christian/Christ follower vids) are the 21st century equivalent of "Lord, I thank thee that I am not like other men..." (Which is odd, because I'd bet that "authentic" man would see himself as the publican, not just another form of a Pharisee.)

Brendt said...

(oops, make that Rambler -- sorry I got your name wrong)

Jay H said...

Jared: I see your point, and I don't think your rant was offbase.

One comment, though: at the end, you say, "Dear God, make us crave the gospel, make us desire grace, make us satisfied in and with You alone for Your glory alone."

Dude, whoa. I mean, even ignoring the whole free will issue -- what's up with you telling God what to do?

Sorry, but it occurred to me a week ago that we Christians never actually ask God for anything in our prayers -- our entire prayer history seems to be one of giving God polite commands. You know, imperative sentence structures softened, if we have our wits about us, with a "please." And your tagline there seemed like a particularly extreme example, what with the italicized verbs, so it called my earlier thoughts to mind.

(Of course, the Psalms and the Lord's Prayer all do the same thing, so maybe I'm just being touchy. Still, there it is, I guess.)

Jared said...

Jay: Weird comment.

I'm asking God to make me submit to the gospel, because I am a sinful person and do not want it naturally. It's not as if I'm telling God to give me stuff or go smite my enemies. I'm telling him to have his way with me.
I did say "Dear" to God. I am sorry if the absence of a "please" gives the impression of commanding God. I am really begging him.

Sort of a "Lord, I believe, help my unbelief" sort of thing.

Jay H said...

Jared: You're right, it was a weird comment -- I admit that, own that.

Like I said, a week or so ago it just hit me that I've never actually heard a Christian prayer where we really ask God for anything. And I'd be comfortable with anyone saying it's an unrealistic expectation, because, honestly, the Lord's Prayer (as conveyed to us by the Gospels) is what we're all taking as our model, and the grammar there is the same polite commands we all use: "Give us this day our daily bread... Forgive us our sins." Not "Would you forgive us our sins?"

I've just been wondering why we never actually *really* ask. So what you wrote just sort of fell into the question that's been occupying my mind, and you had no way to know that.

bill said...

dude. i couldn't agree with you more about the 'us vs. them' crap. i really couldn't. great stuff.

i just wish you didn't have to come off equally has bad while ranting against it. i guess that is the downside of rants. good thing you kept it for the blog and not the sermon.

anyhoo, i don't know you...you don't know me, so maybe i have no place in saying this: but isn't the name of your blog 'gospel-driven' pretty much doing the same thing (by playing off of the 'purpose-driven' deal) as what you are railing against?

dre said...

Thanks for this post. Now please help me out here: Isn't it a good thing to be cool, for the sake of the people we're trying to win? "To the Jews, I became like the Jew, etc." would be the justification for people to become like the world to the world.
Would appreciate the insight.

Jared said...

Bill, "taking off" on media already created is only part of the rant. And it's not the taking off that I am objecting to, but the taking off and then claiming of innovation and originality.
I figure the phrasing of my blog title will sound familiar to roughly 99% of evangelicals. I'm cool with that. It is the Gospel of Jesus that drives me, so it is authentic for me to use it. :-)

I am sorry I came off as "bad" with the rant.
I have tried in the post to acknowledge my own culpability in the problem.
---

Dre:
There's nothing wrong with being cool. I hope I'm cool.
It's the idolization of cool I am concerned about.

I do not think "trying to be cool" is exactly what Paul has in mind with that admonition, and he certainly wouldn't say "be like the world."
Culturally speaking, we are part of the culture, we are in the culture, and I think Christians ought to be missional, which is to say they should live the gospel live as a witness to those within their cultural milieu.

I actually think, if we're talking authenticity, that most nonChristians can see right through someone "becoming like them" to win them, particularly when becoming like them means adopting an appearance or affectation we wouldn't have otherwise. It becomes about baiting the hook or something.
Why not be a gospel-life witness to the people we encounter every day, and instead of trying to be like others to win them, be ourselves and trust the power of the Spirit to testify to himself through our love and mercy?

Just a thought.

I honestly do not have a problem with the appropriation of cultural aesthetics in the delivery of the gospel. It is when the delivery becomes more cultural aesthetics than gospel that we have drifted into idolatry. It is when culture begins to drive the church's programming and methodology that we have accomodated the world in ways Scripture warns us against.
---

(None of this has anything to do with wearing suits or playing organ music, btw. I am not surprised some commenters are thinking it does; it sort of proves my point about the whole us vs. them thing.)

Thanks for your comments, guys.
Peace

Joseph said...

***I crave grace alone through faith alone; I cannot trade one sort of works salvation for another***

Well, this is not what the Orthodox teach. Although you may not be interested in the rituals and ornamentation of the ancient liturgical churches, what you are craving IS what is in the ancient church. As my priest says, all Orthodox theology points to Christ crucified and Christ resurrected. No works needed for salvation here.

Nevertheless, you are obviously doing what you are called to do and in the manner in which you are doing it. God has truly blessed you and your vision, so I have to say "right on" about your post. Today I got a card from a large nondenominational church that is adding Sat. evening services for those that prefer to sleep in late on Sunday mornings. Can't inconvenience ourselves for God, obviously. Plus their programmed sermons are all drawn from the pop culture as you describe.

I think you have made a great observation, and regardless of whether we're Protestant, Orthodox, or Catholic, we all have to be aware and ready to fight against this dumbing down of Christian belief that is being propagated by the Evil One. May God Bless your ministries.

Lee said...

Jared,

I am a very ordinary Christian (how's that for 'real' humility?), and you are addressing evangelicals specifically, so I may have missed your point. If so, I apologize.

But I do need to say that I have many friends of various Christian beliefs (plus a New-Ager), and one of my closest friends is indeed an evangelical with a fervent faith in God that puts my faltering courage to shame at times. (I'm an Episcopalian -- Catholic Lite; she's Church of God.)

I don't know what she'd make of these videos, but I do know she watches, for example, Benny Hinn, and draws inspiration and comfort from his performances.

I had never seen B.H. until the other day when I happened to catch a brief bit of his show on television. I frankly felt repelled, perhaps as much by his appearance and demeanor as by his supposed "healings." Like you, my impression was that he is a lying and creepy bastard.

But should I try to talk my friend out of enjoying his performances? I truly feel I shouldn't. If my friend meets God in a Benny Hinn performance, so be it. As long as she is grounded in Scripture and depends on Jesus Christ for her salvation (both of which are the case), then who am I to tell her that B.H. is not where spiritual truth is to be found?

Do we not need to trust the Holy Spirit to lead her, and us, to where we need to go next?

Not every Christian can be an intellectual. (My friend is quite intelligent but not 'intellectual.') Not every Christian can be cool. I find shows like Benny Hinn embarassing, creepy, and probably deceptive, but my open-hearted friend sees only sick people being healed by prayer.

Is that so unendurable? Is it really "symptomatic of the consumerist, self-centered, behavioristic, culture-driven lunacy passing for ministry today." Or is it more like "entering the Kingdom of Heaven as a little child?"

I might as well finish by admitting that I didn't really see what was wrong with the videos either. Certainly I didn't find them "spiritually bankrupt dreck from the pit of hell." I thought they were amusing (as I did the original Mac/PC ones), but I wasn't sure which side I was on. The one guy is earnest but tense; the other guy is cool but idea-less. (Myself, I meet three of those four criteria.) Both guys seemed OK to me, and the suit-and-tie man didn't utter any blasphemies or do anything that actually contradicts the gospel, so if he is the villain, he's a pretty mild one.

In any case, *of course* the videos don't deal with "the dark night of the soul!" They are "milk," not "meat" -- skim milk, at that. But IMNSHO, they're not strychnine, either. They are simply light-hearted attempts to get nominal Christians to look at their nominal faith more closely, I suppose. If they have that effect, I don't see how they are harmful.

Certainly, more theologically educated and grounded people like you may find them intolerably fluffy, but -- pits of hell? Golly!I think there are worse things in the Christian universe than some Mac/PC video knock-offs.

I am reminded about a group of evangelical Christians I knew many years ago who decided to picket the movie theater that was showing the George Burns film, "Oh, God." Their reasons were much the same as yours: The movie made light of spiritual subjects in ways that pandared to the popular culture. Yet that same theater, the other 50 weeks of the year, regularly offered R-rated films and worse, films that showed human beings (mostly attractive young blondes)in degrading, violent, and perverted situations, for the precise purpose of titillating the audience, thus bringing in more revenue. Of course, my Christian friends didn't attend such shows, and so I can sort of understand their overlooking them as a picketing target. But the emphasis still seemed strange to me.

Thanks for letting me have my say.

Randy said...

The makers of those videos might as well have put King David on the left, and his wife Michal on the right.

And, while they're at it, they could rewrite 2 Samuel 6:22.

After all, heaven forbid a follower of God would be seen as a fool in the eyes of the world.